Search results

-Wrong. Arc threatened to kill Vader if he didn't accept. Which is also a soft pk. -Vader was brought to drop his inventory, that was the first and only interaction had before leaving. -You shouldn't have allowed Rockie to demand Vader's items. You should have read the rulebook before...

It's a literal law that you're allowed to resist unlawful arrest.

Just to Recap the situation thus far. -Arc abused a loophole in an attempt to kill Vader. -Vader was Falsely brought to a sit to drop his inventory. -You assumed Vader consented to a PK Duel -Vader left to protect his inventory. Now, In the Rulebook it states that; Soft PK: Loss of...

Wait a minute. There was not. A pk duel. This was an EMPEROR calling his DC member up and Forcing him to call a PK order on a Lord. Then asking his Blade to attack Vader when he was low, during the fight. A PK ORDER is a soft PK. This was not a PK duel; This was not two people agreeing to...

He was instantly asked to drop his items. It's reasonable for him to defend himself against what was clearly against the rulebook.

mashallah brother

That means literally nothing. The rule book that is linked on the forums states that it's the only rulebook; any other rulebooks, rulings, etc are invalid.

Isn't the point Moot since he shouldn't have been brought into what was obviously an invalid seizure of his items? He was either forced to lose his character or log out; Either way 3 days is excessive considering the Sit shouldn't have happened in the first place.

This exact scenario is stated directly in the rulebook. Killed while enacting a PK order. You also can't imply you want to drop items. Why would you alter the punishment for a PK based on the assumption Vader wanted to. Especially without asking him clearly. Him asking him what Item he wants...

+1 You shouldn't be banned for LTAP if the punishment shouldn't have been applied to the user in the first place. Vader shouldn't be punished for Frog not knowing PK conditions. Forcing someone to enact a PK order is a gross abuse of a loophole and should be closed. This reflects poorly on...

I'm not gonna lie, you shouldn't have charged back; and the way you were behaving isn't acceptable But The fact that he's still here trying to get unbanned a week later should prove that he does take this server seriously. If the charge backs didn't go through, a reduced ban would probably...

Aight, I'll change it out

Your globally-used name: Andross STEAMID32:STEAM_0:0:82886298 Model Link: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=385866957 Model ID:models/child.mdl Approved by Ronnie

Your globally-used name: Andross STEAMID32:STEAM_0:0:82886298 Model Link: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2535691419 Model ID:models/kory/lol/lol_viego.mdl Approved by Ronnie