+1 As you can see, this man had the most detailed explanation as to why he should be unbanned. I really understand the rhetoric being used here, and I think it contributes well to his main argument of being unbanned. The length is short and sweet, making a concise format so that the reader can quickly and easily interpret his message, creating a clear translation. The logic is perfect, and it all made sense to me as I read it. I can see no fallacy in his argument at all, specifically his reasoning, and that is why I must support this man.